Sharpe v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec. Admin. (11th Cir. 2022) - interacting with others, treating physician (old law) we cannot say that the

we cannot say that the record before us contains evidence that a reasonable person would accept as adequate to support the conclusion that Sharpe was able to have occasional interaction with supervisors and coworkers in a working environment

Subjective symptoms - daily activities

RFC – noise level

Given that Sharpe’s social network did not extend beyond his immediate family

Issues Briefed:

Sharpe v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec. Admin. (11th Cir. 2022) - interacting with others, treating physician (old law) we cannot say that theSharpe v. Commr, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 20 14350, 2022 WL 152229 (11th Cir. 2022) (Decision by Circuit Judges Wilson, Rosenbaum, and Jill Pryor) (per curiam) Briefs Included: Appellants Initial Brief and Appellants Reply Brief Topics addressed: RFC relationship with PRTF findings RFC interacting with co workers, supervisors and the public RFC post DLI evidence Treating physicians opinion (old law) good cause Retrospective medical opinions Mental